Thursday, May 28, 2026

Bankruptcy vs. Non-Bankruptcy: Privacy Implications

 










By John E. Hyde, Managing Director – Special Situations, Graphic Arts Advisors, LLC

When financial challenges mount and the business continues to tread water, owners and senior management of companies in the printing, mailing, and graphic communications industries usually focus on the immediate steps needed to stay afloat: cutting costs, securing new capital, or restructuring debt. Then the thought process often turns to finding a buyer for the business or closing the doors without an M&A solution. Along the way, the word “bankruptcy” comes into the conversation. 

While the numbers and legal procedures are at the forefront, one critical factor often gets overlooked: privacy. The path you choose can have lasting consequences for how much sensitive business information becomes public knowledge. Bankruptcy can inadvertently serve as a legal security leak of your most sensitive data. 

Bankruptcy as a Last Resort… Or is it? 

Bankruptcy comes to mind quickly because it's the knee-jerk reaction stemming from years of seeing those corny billboard advertisements and hearing late-night infomercials. “We can’t afford these lease payments, the bank is all over me, and the vendors are cutting us off,” says more than one business owner. “So, we’re going to have to go bankrupt.” But then reality kicks in when the business owner learns more about the real challenges inherent in filing for bankruptcy. Most business owners pull back, often changing direction in favor of non-bankruptcy solutions. One of those reality checks involves privacy implications.

What Gets Disclosed in Bankruptcy?

Bankruptcy requires disclosure of all the company’s creditors. No one worries too much about listing banks, credit cards, trade vendors, and leases, but what about Aunt Betsy or Uncle Bob who helped cover payroll a few weeks ago? They will end up on the creditors’ list, and their names and addresses will be visible to the other creditors and to anyone who searches the bankruptcy case through online tools. Beyond disclosure of the roster of creditors, other disclosures may be necessary depending on the circumstances of the case. Examples include customer lists, payroll information, and income tax returns. The debtor’s skilled bankruptcy lawyer can object to certain disclosures, and it would not come as a surprise to seasoned bankruptcy watchers that legal fees can seriously add up in litigation over the scope and necessity of sensitive disclosures.  

Now think about that. Unless you have the right bankruptcy lawyer and the ability to hunker down in legal defense mode, there is a reasonable possibility of public disclosure about owners' compensation, payroll costs, and revenues from specific customers (e.g., the Debtor’s detailed AR aging report) and this is not the full list. 

The Privacy Advantage of Non-Bankruptcy Solutions

By comparison, in non-bankruptcy cases, there is much more control and discretion over how information is used; in most cases, granular details do not have to be disclosed, and, if they do, disclosure is on a limited, confidential basis. The process requires a willingness to disclose, but in practice, such details rarely come to light.

The Critical Fork in the Road

Sitting at that fork in the road between non-bankruptcy and bankruptcy, it's important to consider the privacy implications.

The choice between bankruptcy and a non-bankruptcy approach is not just a financial decision, but also about how much of your business’s inner workings will be exposed to the world. While bankruptcy offers a structured legal path, it comes with significant public disclosure requirements. Non-bankruptcy solutions often offer greater flexibility, allowing business leaders to protect sensitive data while still working toward a resolution. Before making your choice, weigh not only the dollars and cents, but also the lasting impact on your companys privacy.


Monday, April 13, 2026

When Buyers Change Their Minds













By John Hyde, Managing Director, Special Situations, Graphic Arts Advisors

We changed our minds. Those were the words that came in an email to one of our clients, an owner of a treading water printing company that had just signed a letter of intent. The seller, our client, was all excited to come out of the Thanksgiving holiday with an opportunity to move from a letter of intent to a formal contract and a closing, when they suddenly received an email from their buyer: “We changed our minds.”

Ouch. So, what does that mean for other owners considering selling their businesses? Or owners who are thinking of buying another company? What is instructive from this communication? There are several takeaways. 

Timing of Information

One relevant element is the timing of when this information was provided to the seller. Was it right before the closing, after all the time and money and effort invested in legal, financial, and operational details, or was it before? The heavy lifting takes place between the letter of intent and the formal closing. Thankfully, in this situation, it was before all the effort that would go into getting from the letter of intent to the closing.

What Changed Their Mind

There are a number of reasons a buyer may change their mind. Could it be that there was something about the seller that the buyer got spooked by? In this case, the answer was clearly no. In other cases, the disclosures create a set of facts that can make the buyer kind of nervous, revealing things they didn't expect. Or maybe the information is not as clear as they had hoped.

Disclosures can also shed light on some potential problems involving a seller’s customers and their profitability. The problems could be coming out regarding employee issues, or maybe there's something that involves operational matters that the buyer is having cold feet about before they go all the way into the relationship through a formal closing.

Who Knew About the Sale

Keeping early-day conversations and intentions close when selling your business is key. One scenario that could be harmful during and after a transaction is complete is whether any “other parties” knew about the desire to sell too early.

Did the employees know? Did the customers know? Did the suppliers catch wind? Thankfully, in this case, none of those constituencies was aware of a letter of intent, and the business owner had a strong desire to sell their business. If so, this could have had incredible ramifications on the existing business, especially had the buyer backed out later in the process! 

So those magic words, “we changed our minds,” resulted in a really tough day for one of our clients. In this case, the business is still viable for sale thanks to decisions made by the seller and working alongside the advisors to assist in managing information and interactions. 

I encourage all who consider entering a merger or acquisition transaction to be mindful that often things don’t go as planned. 

John Hyde has more than 30 years as one of the leading consultants to the printing, mailing and graphics communications industries in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, non-bankruptcy debt restructuring, and orderly wind-down of assets and liabilities. Connect with GAA at www.graphicartsadvisors.com